REDGRAVE ACTION GROUP

the campaigning arm of the  New Farnham Repertory Company 

Home

Tickets

What we’re doing to Save the Redgrave Theatre, & how you can help.

The current threat to demolish the Redgrave and how this came about

Redgrave's story

The purpose of the 
    New Farnham Repertory Company

New season of plays. Events. Fund-raising.

Archive of photos about past seasons of plays

How you can get involved as a volunteer

News of NFRC actors

Find us

Get in touch with Redgrave Action Group, New Farnham Repertory Company, and many local arts groups

otherwise known as the Site Map

 
Letters to the Farnham Herald
 

We reproduce on this page a selection of letters written to the Herald on the subject of the Redgrave Theatre and the East Street redevelopment plans.

 

 

Click below for letters published in

 

 

Letters to the Farnham Herald

February 2004

 

Hannah Williams, publicity coordinator, Redgrave Action Group.

 

Sir, - I have spent many a happy half-hour having a coffee in the delightful Lion and Lamb Yard.

Last summer I took my brother and sister-in-law there for lunch; they were totally enchanted by it all - this is what they had imagined Farnham would be like.

I dare say when the East Street redevelopment is complete they will want to visit the new shops and cafés in the new town square.

In last week's Farnham Herald there was an almost lyrical description of the Town Square, accompanied by an artist's impression. We were reminded of the Cobbett Clock and the restored Brightwell House. No one mentioned that on one side would be a huge Sainsbury's and, surprise, surprise, they forgot to mention that the Town Square would be on the graveyard of the Redgrave Theatre. - maybe it should be called The Red Grave Square!

Just think about it, we could be sitting having coffee on the very spot where the famous actor, Sir Michael Redgrave, buried his time capsule! - or maybe on the stage area where some of our finest actors have trodden the boards! It gives me the shivers, even thinking about it and I always thought architects were supposed to be imaginative, artistic people!

Maybe they would like to put the bust of Sir Michael (currently in the Farnham Museum) under the Cobbett Clock and then the two distinguished gentlemen could support each other!

William Cobbett loved passionately the English countryside and felt deep sympathy for ordinary people who were suffering because of the mindless decisions of the bosses. Sir Michael Redgrave loved everything about the English language and the works of the great English bards.

What would they make of this square that will have been created out of the ashes of Farnham's unique cultural heritage?

Believe me, they will be turning in their graves!

 

                           Hannah Williams, Director,

                                    New Farnham Repertory Company

 

This letter first appeared in the Farnham Herald on 5 March 2004.

 

Letters to the Farnham Herald

March 2004

 

Local actor-director William Whymper, as he appeared

in the title role in Henry IV part 1, Farnham 2003

 

 

Sir, - With regard to the revised East Street development master plan (which excludes the Redgrave Theatre) revealed in the Farnham Herald on 20 February, we ask:

How appropriate is it for Crest Nicholson and Sainsbury's (CNS), the developers of the East Street site, to have a designated store on that site? Is there not a real conflict of interest here?

When Parliament debates a public issue MPs have to declare an interest where it is relevant, and this sometimes means they cannot take part in the debate in question. So, can CNS serve the community impartially when its own interests are essentially involved?

Furthermore, does Sainsbury's really need larger premises in the centre of Farnham when they already have a large store in Water Lane?

In common with thousands of people we want the Redgrave Theatre restored and retained.

We heartily support Richard Saxby-Soffe's views (Herald, 27 February) regarding the development plans.

The retention of the present Sainsbury's in South St., the retention of the Redgrave Theatre (with incorporated cinema and restaurant facilities), and the rearrangement of the proposed retail units would still allow enough space for the proposed town square.

In this way Sainsbury's would avoid accusations that the whole development is simply a cosmetically dressed-up land-grab.

 

                         WILLIAM  WHYMPER, ACTOR WITH THE

                                            New Farnham Repertory Company,

                        AND DIRECTOR FOR FARNHAM SHAKESPEARE COMPANY.

                                                                   and

                                                  LESLEY WHYMPER.

 

This letter first appeared in the Farnham Herald on 12 March 2004.

 

 

Letters to the Farnham Herald

April 2004

 

Hannah Williams, publicity coordinator, Redgrave Action Group.

 

Sir,

 

Saturday, June 12th 2004 is the 30th Anniversary of the Royal Gala Opening of the Redgrave Theatre.

The opening production was ‘Romeo and Juliet’ and the every first voice to be heard over the sound system in the new theatre was that of Sir Michael Redgrave with the words of the famous prologue:

 

“Two households both alike in dignity”

 

and includes the immortal words:

 

 “ A pair of star-cross’d lovers”

 

-     Absolutely magical!  A very poignant moment in Farnham’s history!

 

It would be unthinkable if the New Farnham Repertory Company, which has worked tirelessly over the last five years to champion the cause of retaining The Redgrave, did not mark this day in some special way.

 

After all, the NRFC has organised petitions, written hundreds of letters, arranged yellow ribbon days, held endless, endless meetings, initiated numerous fund-raising events – AND with the minimum of resources produced three amazing seasons of plays, either in the open-air or in a tent! How much easier it would have been if we had had a proper theatre!

 

However, undaunted we will soon be producing two more brilliant plays: “Charlie’s Aunt” will be performed outside The Redgrave in the NRFC marquee ( generously donated), and the truly beautiful play so aptly named  "Our Town" will be performed in an actual building, generously offered – the magnificent St Andrew’s Church.   Oh, the joys of having a roof over our heads and our actors not having to compete with a wedding disco or a thunderstorm!

 

The Day of Action

Still, we march on! At 12 noon on June 12th, the Redgrave Action Group, which is the campaigning arm of the NFRC, will organise a symbolic march around the Redgrave. We will ring the theatre with garlands of flowers to remind everyone that the Redgrave could become the ‘jewel in the crown’ of the new development and once again be a place that nurtures creativity and young talent and cherishes our unique theatrical heritage.

 

What else you can do

We will be calling on friends and supporters to mark June 12th by contacting personally all 57 Waverley Borough Councillors. Please telephone, fax, email, send text messages, send postcards etc with the message:-

 

Say ‘No’ to demolition and ‘Yes’ to Rejuvenation

 

and do this as close as possible to the anniversary date of June 12th. We will not hand up the Redgrave to the Waverley bulldozers!  The people of Farnham built and paid for their theatre and they want it back!

 

Should you wish to help in any way please contact:

 

Hannah Williams, Publicity Coordinator for June 12th

Tel. 01256 322529     Fax 01256 333991

 

Ian Mullins, Chairman NFRC: 01252 792813

 

David Wylde, Chairman R.A.G.: 01252 722193

 

You can also keep up to date with the campaign, this season’s productions, and a wealth of other information by visiting our regularly-updated website: www.redgravefarnham.co.uk

 

Hannah Williams

Redgrave Action Group

This letter first appeared in the Farnham Herald on 16 April 2004

 

 

In a letter to the Farnham Herald Ann Cooper explains the encouraging signs she has detected in the stance of the East Street developer, Crest Nicholson.  

Sir

The analysis of the next public consultation exercise on east Street, however conducted, will not leave more than a couple of weeks for the redrawing of Master Plan III if it is to go to Waverley’s executive on June 1. There is an intention to drive the project through with minimum changes and only a token gesture towards public opinion.

 

However, there may be a hitch for this fast-track train: the Redgrave Theatre. Should the request for listing status be granted the Secretary of State would be very unlikely to look favourably on a subsequent request to demolish it shortly afterwards.

 

Even without the independent listing of the modern theatre building the Redgrave is already protected under the grade II listing of Brightwell House. The case I have presented to the DCMS (Department of Culture Media and Sport) would also stand as the basis for a solid objection to any planning application which might require its demolition.

 

Last week I met representatives from the developers, Crest Nicholson, and they repeated to me what they have said before: that they would and could include the Redgrave in a new master plan, even though it would mean a new concept for the East Street site. All they need is for Waverley to ask them to do it. They would be anxious to improve the exterior of the theatre and to incorporate it sensitively into the plan.

 

There is a now gathering momentum for the retention of the Redgrave Theatre and this may literally change the landscape of the whole East Street project. The Redgrave Theatre, refurbished as a working theatre on the inside and improved on the outside, could be an asset not just for the Borough but for the whole region. There are opportunities for creative thinking here, both architecturally and for ways to ensure that the theatre would have a viable future. Minds are already focusing on this exciting challenge.

 

I would urge all supporters of the Redgrave to ensure that their views are registered with Waverley and the developers in the public consultation process.

 

Mrs Anne Cooper, Nutshell Lane, Upper Hale.

 

This letter appeared in the Farnham Herald

on 2 April 2004

 

 

Anne Cooper, Farnham resident who is working

to get the Redgrave Theatre listed.

 

Sir,

The wording of questions in the forthcoming East Street public consultations survey will be critical to the responses received. For example, the latest Farnham News put out by the local Conservatives contains a survey on the East Street proposals. In it there are two questions that refer to the scrapping of the East Street development if the Redgrave theatre were to be kept. This is either ill-informed or disingenuous as the developers have told me that they would be able to keep the Redgrave in a new master plan. They are obviously not going to walk away over this issue.

 

Request for supporters to act

Crest Nicholson have invited campaigners for the Redgrave to write to them direct, copying to Waverley officers and the portfolio holder, asking for questions on the Regrave to be included in their joint survey.

 

My own letter to Crest Nicholson requests that any questions on the Redgrave should be in the context of it as part of community entertainment complex/centre. Such a centre would offer cinema, theatre, music, lecture and conference space, etc.. The survey questions should be along the following lines:

  1. Would you like to see the Brightwell/Regrave buildings restored for the community as part of an entertainment complex?

  2. Would you like the Redgrave theatre refurbished to provide a multi-use auditorium for the community?

  3. Would you like to see the exterior of the Redgrave Theatre improved and incorporated sympathetically into the development plans?

Ideas from the public on the East Street plans are being fed to councillors who then pass them on to the officers at Waverley. After agreement they are then put to the developers - who are paying for the whole exercise - and only then are questions decided upon. Let us hope that all parties will allow democracy to survive this process.

Mrs Anne Cooper

Nutshell Lane

Upper Hale

 

This letter first appeared in the Farnham Herald on 16 April 2004.

 

May 2004