
NFRC put case to have the Redgrave listed
The following article appeared in the
Farnham Herald on 16 April 2004.
Campaigners for the
retention of the Redgrave Theatre have submitted their case for listing
the building to the Department of Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS).
The New Farnham Repertory Company (NFRC) has been campaigning to save
the Redgrave from demolition as part of the planned redevelopment of
East Street since it closed in 1998.
Many would see little architectural merit in the 1974 building but the
NFRC argues it should be listed because the adjoining 1792 Brightwell
House is Grade II listed.
It has submitted a weighty document to Gordon Howell, the historic
environment case officer at the DCMS.
The document includes letters of support from Pam Ayres, Charles
Spencer, the Daily Telegraph's theatre critic, the Reverend
Andrew Tuck, Rector of St Andrew's Church, Gordon Harris, chairman of
the Farnham Society, and Michael Blower, Waverley councillor.
There are also brief messages from Simon Callow, Dame Judi Dench,
Timothy West and Sir Ian McKellen.
In the document the NFRC says the theatre should be listed because it
has "one of the best auditoriums in the UK", was built by public
subscription and has historical links with the Castle Theatre, which
preceded it, and the Redgrave family.
Also included is a letter from theatre consultant, Michael Holden, who
helped design the Redgrave.
Meanwhile,
a member of the NFRC, Anne Cooper, has complained that a postal survey
by prospective Conservative MP Jeremy Hunt about the East Street
redevelopment misleads people about the Redgrave.
She claims a question asking people if they want the Redgrave retained
gives the impression developers Crest Nicholson would withdraw from the
planned redevelopment if the Redgrave were to be retained.
In a letter to The Herald Mrs Cooper writes: "This is either
ill-informed or disingenuous, as the developers told me they would be
able to include the Redgrave in a new masterplan. They are obviously not
going to walk away over this issue. (For
the full text of the letter follow this link.)
Asked to comment, Terry Prescott, for the developers, issued this
statement: "The masterplan for East Street has been designed to respond
to Waverley's development brief in a way that creates a viable and
sustainable scheme for this part of Farnham.
"The retention of the Redgrave isn't part of this masterplan because it
isn't a requirement of this brief."
He would not comment further.
Meanwhile, Waverley officers and Liberal Democrat councillors on
Waverley's decision-making executive committee will meet Crest Nicholson
executives next week to determine the content of a questionnaire that
will be sent to 16,500 homes in Farnham.
Chris Mansell who, as portfolio holder for the redevelopment project,
will be among those at the meeting, said: "We are all keen to get as
full a response as possible from the people of Farnham and the questions
must be wide-ranging yet reflect also the specific concerns that have
been expressed.
"The results of the survey will be published and when Waverley
councillors take their decision in July on a revised masterplan, so will
the reasoning behind their decision. This process has to be
transparent." |